The Chemical Brothers Remixes (2008)

January 9th, 2009 at 4:54 pm (Electro House, Remixes)

The 2008 Remix album from Chemical Brothers

01. The Prodigy – Voodoo People (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
02. Bomb The Bass – Bug Powder Dust (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
03. Method Man – Bring The Pain (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
04. The Charlatans – Nine Acre Dust (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
05. Lionrock – Packet Of Piece (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
06. Leftfield – Open Up (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
07. Primal Scream – Swastika Eyes (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
08. Mercury Rev – Delta Sun Bottleneck Stomp (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
09. The Sabres Of Paradise – Tow Truck (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
10. Dave Clarke – No Ones Driving (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
11. Deeper Throat – Mouth Organ (The Chemical Brothers Remix)
12. Spiritualized – I Think I'm In Love (The Chemical Brothers Remix)

Download
108MB

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Loading ... Loading ...

15 Comments »

  1. Anonymous said,

    January 10th, 2009 at 3:18 am

    hmmmmm, a whole album? even if it is just remixes, doesnt that cross some sort of music blog line?

    I mean, what does it achieve by posting the whole album? Its not really promoting the artist or label, because they get nothing back for what they did.

    I know that you do not put up the material yourself, you just link it, but isnt that just as bad, only not illegal? Im not saying you do, but It looks like you are promoting music piracy… By linking the tracks you are enabling and encouraging people to download copyrighted music without paying what is owed to the artist/label that worked hard to make it.

    I do not work in the music industry or anything like that, but i am a music enthusiast and hate to see the industry falling to its knees financially (especially in edm). I admit that i sometimes download the odd track off an ep or album so i can get a better feel for the artist than a 1 minute 30 clip on beatport, but I just dont understand what you gain from posting these links? Particularly ones like the top ten beatport tech-house or this one – they just seem like you are just letting people download tracks for free and are not promoting your favourite song/artist of the moment?

    obviously there is nothing to stop you doing this in the way of the law, and im sure that you do this with the best intentions but you have just become a bit more casual over time, but perhaps posting albums and beatport top tens is too far.

  2. Ralph P said,

    January 10th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Anonymous stop being a total cock! cheers

  3. That DJ said,

    January 10th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    I work on the principle that the majority of the music people download off this blog, they would not actually ever pay for. For example, i know i would never pay for a Defected in the House album from 4 years ago. However ive found it on a blog and download and its good to listen to once or twice.

    Me putting links to artists stuff makes people who would probably never buy their stuff become interested in their music and subsequentially may go and see those artists Live. I personally know several people who have chosen to go to nights where the DJs are playing, soley because of hearing their music on this site. More clubnights will book DJS if theres larger audiences meaning the DJs are earning more for playing.

    I understand what you mean about beatport top 10s or full albums but these could be obtained elsewhere within a few clicks. I am just choosing to promote which genres and DJs that get posted so that more people can enjoy the music.

    Also legally this site is sound within the UK as under the 1992 Home Recording Act it is legal to distribute music as long as there is no commercial gain. I am not Ripping or uploading music merely providing links to where music is obtained making a site a catalyst for downloading but not a source of music.

  4. Mr B said,

    January 10th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    Ask any producer in the electro/dance scene. They really don’t care.

    It wouldnt suprise me if alot of their material was downloaded of sites alike.

    Thanks for everything :)

  5. Anonymous said,

    January 11th, 2009 at 12:08 am

    ok i see where your coming from. i guess my point is better summed up by Ben Watt the owner of buzzing fly when he was asked if he thought blogs hurt the music industry………………….

    Yes I do think they do damage when downloads are offered as opposed to streams. Some people try to liken blogs with dowloadable audio to pirate radio stations or the age of bootleg cassettes, but the problem is to do with the distribution potential. No one much minded when piracy was contained, but now the Internet gives the potential to disseminate vast numbers of tracks with absolutely no payback to the creator of that music. It is as if suddenly overnight Radio 1 and the entire TV and radio networks all over the world were suddenly allowed to play stuff for FREE. No PRS. No needle time. No publishing. The industry would collapse.

    I believe in new legislation to protect the writers and artists. License fees or pay per play, even on the Internet. Or perhaps levies on the sale of MP3 players that goes back to the artists and labels. One of these methods has to be employed. Until then I would prefer to see more responsible blogging where streaming at lower res replaces free downloads, and bloggers put their own ego to one side and think about the repercussions. I once got a blogger to remove a freely downloadable Justin Martin track of ours. He said there had only been about 40 downloads of the track, so why did I worry. I pointed out that was $40 removed from the pocket of Justin Martin, which is what he was getting paid to bar-tending to supplement his DJ career. When I put it like that, the guy suddenly saw through it all. He removed the track and stopped giving away free tracks.

    There is another argument that says bloggers are helping to “promote” the artist in the same way that labels give away free copies in the run-up to a release, but fails to realise that labels tightly control free goods so as not to impinge too much on real sales while still breathing a little oxygen into a project. Simply putting the track for free on the Internet is just inviting a free-for-all. It is ultimately unethical if it isn’t approved by the artist and the label. Ultimately, yes, blogging does have a major role to play in music promotion but only when done responsibly. The reason society got rid of the Wild West was that too many people were getting killed.

  6. scott willis said,

    January 11th, 2009 at 2:49 am

    blogs like these save people from wasting there cash buy try before you but , film piracy critics give the same story , but ive one hell of a legal vynil , mp3 , blue ray and dvd collection .
    some of these i would never have dreamed of before lsitening to them on blogs like this ,

  7. That DJ said,

    January 11th, 2009 at 3:05 am

    Thanks for posting that decent response from ben watt. Quite weird actually cause i went to see him Dj about 3 weeks ago after i downloaded “Ben Watt & Ivan Gough – In The Mix 2006″ off Popkiller’s blog.

    Another argument that causes problems to how to tackle downloading is that the people who download the most, are actually buying the most music. People who spend a good proportion of their time searching blogs, finding tracks are also the people who are buying the Vinyl and new mp3 releases off beatport. If the industry starts to prosecuting or fining downloaders, it will be destroying a good proportion of their own market.

    This is feel is only true for blogs as they are still at the moment, relatively underground compared to torrents and peer2peer. At the moment its mainly true music fans downloading the music who tend to also purchase legal music, not p2p users who often use p2p as a way of not having to buy any music whatsoever.

  8. simon said,

    January 11th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    never mind the politics. dude moaning didnt even leave his name….thanks for the music and happy nu yr

  9. hello tony pipe said,

    January 11th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    mr Anonymous must have sum sand in his vagina

    nice work hombre

  10. General Bashhard said,

    January 12th, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    People didnt like the Wild Wild West because it was a SHIT movie!
    Go get a bucket and spade and remove the copious amounts of sand from ure vagina!!!

    Peace bitches, stay sweet xxx

  11. Reginald said,

    January 12th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    Hi im a concerned Korean War vetran residing in Middlesex. Im 64 and ive been following the electronic music scene since its explosion in the late 80′ early 90′s and things like this really do trouble me beacuse…………….. Anonymous is a big fat douche head!!!!!! Thanks

  12. Forex Solutions said,

    January 28th, 2009 at 1:19 am

    It reminds me of the smart quote – “Support organizations can always prove success by showing service to someone… Not necessarily you.” (Douglas Evelyn)!!

  13. Extaziee said,

    February 5th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    NO DOWNLOADS!!!!!Error!!

  14. cary sontag said,

    July 3rd, 2009 at 3:09 am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbWri6Dz8e4

  15. Рубен said,

    October 17th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    А это Вы написали на основе Вашего личного опыта?

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Post a Comment